Facts
DNA
Urine Sample
Blood Sample
Vaccine
Pedigree
Teeth
Hearing
Marking
Holidays
Roots
Presents
Dog Movies
Food
Milk
Cheese

Vegetables
Fish
Fruit
Uncooked Meat
Uncooked Eggs
Garlic
Snakes
Greyfriers Bobby
Uk Dog Law
Alpha Dog

Why dogs lift leg

 

 

UK Dog Law

Last Updated November 17, 2008, please check there have been no amendments, or new laws.

Dogs Act 1871
In contrast to the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991, an action brought under the Dogs Act 1871 is a civil complaint that a dog is 'dangerous' and 'not kept under proper control'. Not kept under proper control, means that the dog was neither on a lead nor muzzled. Owners found to have a 'dangerous' dog 'not kept under proper control' could see the destruction of the dog.
Prohibited Dogs
Under Section 1 of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 it is a criminal offence to possess, breed, sell, give away or exchange, abandon or allow to stray, certain types of dog; whilst the most commonly known is the Pit-bull Terrier.
Dangerous Wild Animals Act 1976
The Dangerous Wild Animals Act 1976 was originally introduced following public concern over the keeping of dangerous pets, wolf-dog hybrids.
Protection of Animals
Section 1(1)(a) of the Protection of Animals Act 1911
It is an offence to cruelly beat, ill-treat, kick, over-ride, over-load, torture, infuriate or terrify any domestic or captive animal, or, if you are the owner of any such animal, permit it to be so used or permit any unnecessary suffering to be caused.
Section 1(1)(c) of the Protection of Animals Act 1911
It is an offence to cause, procure or assist at the fighting or baiting of any domestic animal, or to use, permit to be used, any premises for such a person.
Sections 5A and 5B of the Protection of Animals Act 1911
It is an offence to be present, without reasonable excuse, at an animal fight or to publish, cause to be published, an advertisement for a fight between animals.
Section 1 of the Abandonment of Animals Act 1960
It is an offence for any person who is the owner or has charge or control of any domestic animal to abandon it in circumstances likely to cause it unnecessary suffering.
Nuisance
There is no hard and fast rule as to how much barking creates a nuisance, each incident is taken on its own merits after considering the volume, duration and time of occurrence. Like any complaint about noise the Local Authority has a duty to investigate it and, if felt necessary, issue a Noise Abatement Notice.
Public Liability
Most pet insurance companies offer public liability or 'third party' cover; the purpose of which is to protect your legal liability for an accident under one of two headings:-
Negligence
Did you do something you shouldn’t have or failed to do something you should and was it reasonably foreseeable that someone could be injured and/or damaged by your actions or lack of them? If so, you were in all likelihood negligent. If not, and you believe that you did all that you could to prevent an incident or it was purely an accident, you may not have acted negligently.
Animals Act 1971
Section 2(2) of this Act has been the cause of much debate. Essentially, it makes the owner and/or person in charge of a dog ('the 'keeper') 'strictly liable', that is liable without fault where all three of the following can be proven:

a)was damage likely to be caused or if so caused was it likely to be severe? and
b)was the damage or its severity due to the dog displaying a characteristic not normally found in dogs except at particular times and the particular circumstances? and
c)did the owner or the keeper know of this characteristic?

Worrying Livestock
Section 3 of this Act provides for the civil liability of an owner and/or keeper where a dog causes damage by killing or injuring livestock. Such a person could also face criminal prosecution for the same offence under the Dogs (Protection of Livestock) Act 1953.

Furthermore, under Section 9 a dog may be shot, without warning, if it is worrying or about to worry livestock and there is no other means of ending or preventing the worrying or if the dog has already worried livestock and is still in the vicinity but not under the control of anyone nor is there any practical means of finding out to whom the dog belongs.
Stray Dogs
Under Section 2 of the Control of Dogs Order 2002, every dog on a highway or in a public place must wear a collar with the name and address of the owner inscribed on it or on a plate or badge attached to it. Failure to do so is an offence against the Animal Health Act 1981 for which an owner can be prosecuted and fined. Any dog without a collar on a highway or in a public place may be treated as a stray dog and seized by the Local Authority.

If your dog strays, you should contact your local dog warden (through the Environmental Health Department of your Local Authority) immediately and stay in regular contact. If your dog is found by the Local Authority, you must pay the Local Authority’s reasonable expenses before it will be returned to you. If after seven days, the owner of a stray dog does not come forward the Local Authority may transfer the dog to someone else, transfer it to an establishment for stray dogs or have it destroyed.
Responsible Ownership
Under Section 27(5) of the Road Traffic Act 1988 it is a criminal offence to have a dog on a designated road without the dog being on a lead.
Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005
Clean Neighbourhood and Environment Act 2005 allows for the making of a 'Dog Control Order' by District and Parish Councils over land 'which is open to the air and to which the public are entitled or permitted to have access'. Such orders can relate to:

  1. fouling of land by dogs and removal of dog faeces;
  2. the keeping of dogs on leads;
  3. the exclusion of dogs from land;
  4. the number of dogs which a person may take on a lead.

Failure by a person to comply with the Dog Control Order may result in receipt of a fixed penalty notice payable within 14 days.

Puppy Farming and Dog Welfare

The Breeding and Sale of Dogs (Welfare) Act 1999 The Act, which extended the provisions of The Breeding of Dogs Act 1973, relates to the commercial breeding and sale of dogs by regulating the welfare of the dogs, extending the power of inspection of such establishments and ensuring that accurate records of dogs are kept.

Under the provisions of the Act, it is a criminal offence for a person to breed five or more litters for sale without the appropriate licence from their Local Authority. You may believe five or more litters relates to an individual breed of dog, i.e. you may have up to four litters of different breeds before requiring a licence; you would be wrong.

The definition of 'five or more litters' is very broad. The Act states that a person shall be treated as carrying on the business of breeding dogs for sale at the premises, 'if, where a person keeps a bitch at those premises during a twelve month period and during that time she gives birth to a litter of puppies, a total of 4 or more other litters are born to bitches that are;

  1. kept by the person at the premises at any time during the period;
  2. kept by any relative at the premises at any such time;
  3. kept by him elsewhere at any such time;
  4. kept anywhere by any person at any such time under a 'breeding arrangement'.

'Breeding Arrangement' is similarly broadly construed, being defined as a 'contract or other arrangement under which [a] person agrees that another person may keep a bitch on his terms and that, should the bitch give birth, the other person is to provide him with either:

  1. one or more of the puppies, or
  2. the whole or part of the proceeds of selling any of them'.

In consideration of the grant of a breeding licence the Local Authority will have regard to the need for securing:

  1. that the dogs will at all times be kept in accommodation suitable as respects construction, size of quarters, number of occupants, exercising facilities, temperature, lighting, ventilation and cleanliness;
  2. that the dogs will be adequately supplied with suitable food, drink and bedding material, adequately exercised and visited at suitable intervals;
  3. that all reasonable precautions will be taken to prevent and control the spread of infectious or contagious diseases;
  4. that appropriate steps will be taken for the protection of the dogs in case of fire or other emergencies;
  5. that all appropriate steps will be taken to secure that the dogs will be provided with suitable food, drink and bedding material and adequately exercised when being transported to or from the breeding establishment;
  6. that bitches are not mated if they are less than one year old;
  7. that bitches do not give birth to more than six litters of puppies each;
  8. that bitches do not give birth to puppies before the end of the period of 12 months beginning with the day on which they last gave birth to puppies;
  9. that accurate records in a form prescribed by regulations are kept at the premises and made available for inspection by any officer of the Local Authority, or any veterinary surgeon authorised by the Local Authority to inspect the premises.

Should a person act in contravention of the provisions of the Act;

  1. a fine;
  2. cancellation of the licence
  3. disqualification from keeping an establishment requiring of licence, for such period as the Court thinks fit;
  4. disqualification from having custody of any dog of a specified description;
  5. up to three months imprisonment.

Dangerous Dogs Act 1991
It is myth that the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 applies only to so called 'dangerous' or 'fighting' dogs; it does not. It applies to any dog irrespective of its breed or size.

Under Section 3(1) of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 a criminal charge can be brought against the owner (or any person in charge of a dog) if the dog is 'dangerously out of control in a public place'.

Whilst 'public place' is relatively self explanatory, being any place 'to which the public have or are permitted to have access', 'dangerously out of control' makes it sound as though the dog was wildly rampaging around terrorising all and sundry. The reality is of course far less sensational.

A dog is 'dangerously out of control' on 'any occasion on which there are grounds for reasonable apprehension that it will injure any person, whether or not it actually does so'. It follows therefore that a dog does not actually have to injure someone to be dangerously out of control; it is enough that someone is in fear that it might.

Owners and/or persons in charge of dogs found guilty under the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 could see the destruction of the dog, be banned from keeping dogs or even face a prison sentence.