|

Facts
DNA
Urine Sample
Blood Sample
Vaccine
Pedigree
Teeth
Hearing
Marking
Holidays
Roots
Presents
Dog Movies
Food
Milk
Cheese
Vegetables
Fish
Fruit
Uncooked Meat
Uncooked Eggs
Garlic
Snakes
Greyfriers Bobby
Uk Dog Law
Alpha Dog
Why dogs lift leg
|
UK Dog Law
Last Updated
November 17, 2008,
please check there have been no amendments, or new laws.
Dogs Act 1871 In contrast to the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991, an action brought under the
Dogs Act 1871 is a civil complaint that a dog is 'dangerous' and 'not
kept under proper control'. Not kept under proper control, means that
the dog was neither on a lead nor muzzled. Owners found to have a
'dangerous' dog 'not kept under proper control' could see the
destruction of the dog. Prohibited Dogs Under Section 1
of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 it is a criminal offence to possess,
breed, sell, give away or exchange, abandon or allow to stray, certain
types of dog; whilst the most commonly known is the Pit-bull Terrier.
Dangerous Wild Animals Act 1976 The Dangerous Wild Animals
Act 1976 was originally introduced following public concern over the
keeping of dangerous pets, wolf-dog hybrids. Protection of Animals
Section 1(1)(a) of the Protection of Animals Act 1911 It is an offence to cruelly beat, ill-treat, kick, over-ride, over-load,
torture, infuriate or terrify any domestic or captive animal, or, if you
are the owner of any such animal, permit it to be so used or permit any
unnecessary suffering to be caused. Section 1(1)(c) of the Protection of Animals Act 1911
It is an offence to cause, procure or assist at the fighting or baiting
of any domestic animal, or to use, permit to be used, any premises for
such a person. Sections 5A and 5B of the Protection of Animals Act 1911
It is an offence to be present, without reasonable excuse, at an animal
fight or to publish, cause to be published, an advertisement for a fight
between animals. Section 1 of the Abandonment of Animals Act 1960
It is an offence for any person who is the owner or has charge or
control of any domestic animal to abandon it in circumstances likely to
cause it unnecessary suffering. Nuisance There is no hard and fast rule as to how much barking creates a
nuisance, each incident is taken on its own merits after considering the
volume, duration and time of occurrence. Like any complaint about noise
the Local Authority has a duty to investigate it and, if felt necessary,
issue a Noise Abatement Notice. Public Liability Most pet insurance companies offer public liability or
'third party'
cover; the purpose of which is to protect your legal liability for an
accident under one of two headings:- Negligence Did you do something you shouldn’t have or failed to do something you
should and was it reasonably foreseeable that someone could be injured
and/or damaged by your actions or lack of them? If so, you were in all
likelihood negligent. If not, and you believe that you did all that you
could to prevent an incident or it was purely an accident, you may not
have acted negligently. Animals Act 1971 Section 2(2) of this Act has been the cause of much debate.
Essentially, it makes the owner and/or person in charge of a dog ('the
'keeper') 'strictly liable', that is liable without fault where all
three of the following can be proven:
a)was damage likely to be caused or if so caused was it likely to be
severe? and b)was the damage or its severity due to the dog displaying a
characteristic not normally found in dogs except at particular times and
the particular circumstances? and c)did the owner or the keeper know of this characteristic?
Worrying Livestock Section 3 of this Act provides for the civil liability of an owner
and/or keeper where a dog causes damage by killing or injuring
livestock. Such a person could also face criminal prosecution for the
same offence under the Dogs (Protection of Livestock) Act 1953.
Furthermore, under Section 9 a dog may be shot, without warning, if it
is worrying or about to worry livestock and there is no other means of
ending or preventing the worrying or if the dog has already worried
livestock and is still in the vicinity but not under the control of
anyone nor is there any practical means of finding out to whom the dog
belongs. Stray Dogs Under Section 2 of the Control of Dogs Order 2002, every dog on a
highway or in a public place must wear a collar with the name and
address of the owner inscribed on it or on a plate or badge attached to
it.
Failure to do so is an offence against the Animal Health Act 1981 for
which an owner can be prosecuted and fined.
Any dog without a collar on a highway or in a public place may be
treated as a stray dog and seized by the Local Authority.
If your dog strays, you should contact your local dog warden (through
the Environmental Health Department of your Local Authority) immediately
and stay in regular contact. If your dog is found by the Local
Authority, you must pay the Local Authority’s reasonable expenses before
it will be returned to you.
If after seven days, the owner of a stray dog does not come forward the
Local Authority may transfer the dog to someone else, transfer it to an
establishment for stray dogs or have it destroyed. Responsible Ownership
Under Section 27(5) of the Road Traffic Act 1988 it is a criminal
offence to have a dog on a designated road without the dog being on a
lead. Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005 Clean Neighbourhood and Environment Act 2005 allows
for the making of a 'Dog Control Order' by District and Parish Councils
over land 'which is open to the air and to which the public are entitled
or permitted to have access'. Such orders can relate to:
- fouling of land by dogs and removal of dog faeces;
- the keeping of dogs on leads;
- the exclusion of dogs from land;
- the number of dogs which a person may take on a lead.
Failure by a person to comply with the Dog Control Order may result in
receipt of a fixed penalty notice payable within 14 days.
Puppy Farming and Dog Welfare The Breeding and Sale of Dogs
(Welfare) Act 1999
The Act, which extended the provisions of The Breeding of Dogs Act 1973,
relates to the commercial breeding and sale of dogs by regulating the
welfare of the dogs, extending the power of inspection of such
establishments and ensuring that accurate records of dogs are kept.
Under the provisions of the Act, it is a criminal offence for a person
to breed five or more litters for sale without the appropriate licence
from their Local Authority.
You may believe five or more litters relates to an individual breed of
dog, i.e. you may have up to four litters of different breeds before
requiring a licence; you would be wrong.
The definition of 'five
or more litters' is very broad. The Act states that a person shall
be treated as carrying on the business of breeding dogs for sale at
the premises, 'if, where a person keeps a bitch at those premises
during a twelve month period and during that time she gives birth to
a litter of puppies, a total of 4 or more other litters are born to
bitches that are;
- kept by the person at the premises at any time during the period;
- kept by any relative at the premises at any such time;
- kept by him elsewhere at any such time;
- kept anywhere by any person at any such time under a 'breeding
arrangement'.
'Breeding Arrangement' is similarly broadly construed, being defined as
a 'contract or other arrangement under which [a] person agrees that
another person may keep a bitch on his terms and that, should the bitch
give birth, the other person is to provide him with either:
- one or more of the puppies, or
- the whole or part of the proceeds of selling any of them'.
In consideration of the grant of a breeding licence the Local Authority
will have regard to the need for securing:
- that the dogs will at all times be kept in accommodation suitable as
respects construction, size of quarters, number of occupants, exercising
facilities, temperature, lighting, ventilation and cleanliness;
- that the dogs will be adequately supplied with suitable food, drink
and bedding material, adequately exercised and visited at suitable
intervals;
- that all reasonable precautions will be taken to prevent and control
the spread of infectious or contagious diseases;
- that appropriate steps will be taken for the protection of the dogs in
case of fire or other emergencies;
- that all appropriate steps will be taken to secure that the dogs will
be provided with suitable food, drink and bedding material and
adequately exercised when being transported to or from the breeding
establishment;
- that bitches are not mated if they are less than one year old;
- that bitches do not give birth to more than six litters of puppies
each;
- that bitches do not give birth to puppies before the end of the period
of 12 months beginning with the day on which they last gave birth to
puppies;
- that accurate records in a form prescribed by regulations are kept at
the premises and made available for inspection by any officer of the
Local Authority, or any veterinary surgeon authorised by the Local
Authority to inspect the premises.
Should a person act in contravention of the
provisions of the Act;
- a fine;
- cancellation of the licence
- disqualification from keeping an establishment
requiring of licence, for such period as the Court
thinks fit;
- disqualification from having custody of any dog
of a specified description;
- up to three months imprisonment.
Dangerous Dogs Act 1991
It is myth that the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 applies
only to so called 'dangerous' or 'fighting' dogs; it does not. It
applies to any dog irrespective of its breed or size.
Under Section 3(1) of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 a criminal charge can
be brought against the owner (or any person in charge of a dog) if the
dog is 'dangerously out of control in a public place'.
Whilst 'public place' is relatively self explanatory, being any place 'to which the public have or are permitted to have access',
'dangerously
out of control' makes it sound as though the dog was wildly rampaging
around terrorising all and sundry. The reality is of course far less
sensational.
A dog is 'dangerously out of control' on 'any occasion on which
there are grounds for reasonable apprehension that it will injure any
person, whether or not it actually does so'. It follows therefore that a
dog does not actually have to injure someone to be dangerously out of
control; it is enough that someone is in fear that it might.
Owners and/or persons in charge of dogs found guilty
under the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 could see the
destruction of the dog, be banned from keeping dogs
or even face a prison sentence. |